Guestimating the Outcome of Copenhagen Talks

July 3, 2009 – 12:04

Guestimating the Outcome of Copenhagen TalksOne of Australia’s leading climate policy analysts, Dr Andrew McIntosh from Australian National University’s Climate Change Law and Policy Centre, has predicted a global agreement will emerge from the approaching climate-change negotiations in Copenhagen that targets emissions cuts of 10 to 15 percent for developed countries, according to a report in Carbon Extra.

Russia’s new target of a 15 percent emissions cut from 1990 levels by 2020 combined with the U.S. target of a 25 percent cut on its 2005 levels suggests that “we’re going into Copenhagen at around a 10%-15%” global cut on 1990 emissions levels, McIntosh told Carbon Extra. McIntosh based his calculations on developed nations’ stated commitments to emission reduction targets or, if they were not clear, the most likely estimate of emissions cuts they would agree to, to determine “what cuts developed countries as a collective whole would be aiming for in 2020″.

GE ON CLEAN ENERGY_Page_11Still, everyone agrees there are many unknowns that will could shake things up in any number of ways before and during the Copenhagen summit.  One of the biggest unknowns for the Copenhagen talks is what the U.S. will accept.

Climate Change Related Deaths - Forecast by WTO

The US Waxman-Markey climate bill, passed by the US House of Representatives last week, would cut emissions by 17 percent on 2005 levels by 2020. The bill also directs the US Government to use permit revenue to cut emissions by another 10 percent by 2020 by buying international carbon credits. That would make the US target 27 percent on 2005 levels, or 19 percent on 1990 levels by 2020.

“If the US signs up for a 17 percent cut by 2020 then we’re back to an 11 percent” cut on 1990 levels in a global agreement, said McIntosh.

World’s Most Beautiful Solar Building

July 2, 2009 – 22:01

Akademie du Mont Cenis

The  Akademie Mont Cenis in Herne, Germany is a strikingly beautiful wooden structure covered with glass and transparent photovoltaic modules over an old coal mine.  Beautiful.

EPA Cracks Down on Ship Emissions: Enter Cold Ironing

July 2, 2009 – 13:46

The world’s most sea worthy ships – container ships, tankers, bulk carriers, cruise ships and so forth – are also significant sources of air pollution.  Not surprisingly, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has announced plans to reign in ship-based air pollution by imposing a stringent rule for emissions from large U.S.-flagged ships.

The proposed rule would set ambitious engine and fuel standards in an effort to bring U.S. regulations into harmony with international standards and reduce air pollution in U.S. cities and ports.  The rule adds muscle to the recent decision by the U.S. and Canada to designate thousands of miles of the two countries’ coasts as an Emission Control Area.

There are two types of diesel engines used on oceangoing vessels.  The main propulsion engines on most oceangoing vessels are very large “Category 3″ marine diesel engines (those with per-cylinder displacement at or above 30 liters).  Auxiliary engines on oceangoing vessels typically range in size from small portable generators to locomotive-size engines with power of 4,000 kilowatts or more. Auxiliary engines on U.S.-flagged oceangoing vessels are subject to EPA’s marine diesel engine standards for engines with per-cylinder displacement up to 30 liters per cylinder.  

Industry has already developed strategies for complying with the new regulations.  One of the most compelling solutions is a technology called “cold-ironing,” which allows a specially equipped vessel to plug in to local power grids while tied onshore. The vessel can then draw power for its pumps, communications, ventilation, lighting and other needs from Southern California Edison, instead of its own diesel engines. Providing shore power to an off-loading oil tanker is the pollution-reducing equivalent of removing 187,000 cars from the road for a day. In a year, shore power will eliminate more than 30 tons of pollution.  The picture featured below shows a vessel owned by BP, which uses “cold ironing.”

EPA Cracks Down on Ship Emissions: Enter Cold Ironing

The BP shore power installation delivers enough electricity to power about 5,500 homes — up to 8 megawatts at 6,660 volts. The Alaska Tanker Company has equipped two of vessels that regularly visit the Port to be able to plug into the BP Terminal on Pier T, which supplies local refineries with crude oil. The joint project, which was undertaken voluntarily, was completed at a cost of $23.7 million — $17.5 million from the Port and $6.2 million from BP.

Prior to its modification, the Alaskan Navigator burned nearly 10,000 gallons of diesel each day in port to power massive pumps needed to off-load its oil. The Pier T project cost $23.7 million to build – $17.5 million from the Port and $6.2 million from BP – and took three years to complete.

Global Warming Enemy No. 1 Declares Climate Bill “Dead on Arrival” in U.S. Senate

July 1, 2009 – 12:40

Carbon Budget for Humanity is 1 Trillion Tons of CO2

Oklahoma’s Republican senator James Inhofe said the Senate will kill the climate-change legislation that passed by a margin of seven votes in the U.S. House of Representatives last week.  

“It’s dead on arrival in the Senate,” Inhofe said during an appearance at the Vance Development Authority in Enid, Oklahoma on Monday. “It will not happen. I can absolutely guarantee you it’s not going to happen in the Senate.”

The Democratic-controlled House backed the global warming measure on a 219-212 vote late Friday. Eight Republicans voted in favor of the bill, while 44 Democrats voted against it.  A key component of the legislation is the creation of a market-based cap-and-trade program that will reign in carbon emissions by allocating a limited number of allowances to industry, which can trade those allowances amongst themselves.

Inhofe has challenged global warming on nearly every imaginable front, but is best known for his criticisms of climate science.  He has questioned the science that supports the global warming hypothesis, famously dubbing it “the greatest single hoax perpetuated on the American people.”

Cogeneration Facilities Earn Energy Star Award for Significant Energy Savings

June 30, 2009 – 14:14

IEA - CHP-DHC Energy Flow Graphic

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency presented Energy Star Combined Heat and Power (CHP) awards to two organizations that have invested in highly efficient CHP systems to reduce their fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. CHP  or cogeneration can increase efficiency by 60 to 80 percent compared to systems that produce heat and power separately.

Consolidated Edison CHP System of New York received an award for using a CHP system that produces up to 360 megawatts (MW) of electricity, enough to power most of Manhattan.  The system is the largest district steam operation in the world and a key source of electricity for New York City.  The CHP system operates at 75 percent of its optimal thermal and energy levels, better than the industry average, reducing greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to the annual emissions from approximately 150,000 cars.

Read the rest of this entry »